Legal Opinion
Scott v. Zimmer, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 27, 2012No. C.A. No. 10-772 GMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
In this correction of inventorship action, plaintiffs W. Norman Scott, M.D., (“Dr. Scott”) and Giles R. Scuderi, M.D., (“Dr. Scuderi” or collectively, “the plaintiffs”) seek to add themselves as inventors of U.S. Patent No. 6,123,729, U.S. Patent No. 6,402,786, and U.S. Patent No. 6,319,283 (“the patents”) presently assigned to defendants Zimmer, Inc., and Zimmer Technology, Inc. (collectively “the defendants” or “Zimmer”). Dr. Scuderi also seeks to rescind an agreement with Zimmer based on the doctrine of mutual mistake. The court held a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dana-Farber Cancer Inst., Inc. v. Ono Pharm. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Cricut v. Enough For EveryoneDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024