Cricut v. Enough For Everyone
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CRICUT, INC., a Delaware corporation, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT PATENT v. INVENTORSHIP ENOUGH FOR EVERYONE, INC., a Nevada corporation, and DESIRÉE TANNER, an individual, Case No. 2:21-CV-00601-TS-DAO District Judge Ted Stewart Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the Defendant Desiree Tanner’s Motion to Correct Patent Inventorship under 35 U.S.C. § 256(b).1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny Defendant’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND This case involves unjust…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.