Legal Opinion

People v. Lankford

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1976No. Crim. 27201PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first degree robbery.

Since defendant does not attack the sufficiency of the evidence we need not set forth the circumstances of the crimes other than that defendant was positively identified as one of the perpetrators of two such robberies committed on March 4¿$nd April 11, 1974, against operators of liquor stores in the San Fernando Valley. Defendant was tried separately from his accomplices.

Proceedings Under Penal Code Section 1538.5

Officer Hurley of the Los Angeles…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. People v. LaniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Madril v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. GallegosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Gallego v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. AnzaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Marano v. HollandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API