Legal Opinion

Gill v. S.H.B. Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1948No. Docket No. 25, Calendar No. 44,141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing the ease for failure of the declaration to state a cause of action.

Taking the well-pleaded matters in the declaration as true, it appears that defendant is an Ohio corporation admitted to do business in Michigan on March 30,1943; that on May 24,1943, plaintiffs entered into a written agreement with defendant to construct 108 dwelling houses on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis upon lots in Wayne county which defendant had represented it owned; that after plaintiffs had begun con-' struction of 51 houses they learned that defendant did not own all of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Goebel v. LinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Vyne v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Norton v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Carolin Manufacturing Corp. v. George S. May, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Oak Distributing Co. v. Miller Brewing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
  4. Young v. PileggiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Johnson & Anderson, Inc. v. Barlow Associates Management Consultants, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API