Norton v. State Highway Department
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no canse for action entered in the court of claims. The only meritorious ground urged by plaintiff for reversal is that a certain release of claim, executed by him is void if procured by coercion and duress. The facts are not in dispute.
In 1933 plaintiff was awarded a contract by the State highway department for certain highway construction work in Houghton county. The work was part of a Federal aid project and after the work was commenced the Federal bureau of highways demanded a resurvey of the project and a change of plans. This was done, resulting in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Lafayette Dramatic Productions, Inc. v. FerentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Clement v. Buckley Mercantile Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Rees v. SchmitsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
- City of Saginaw v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Apfelblat v. National Bank Wyandotte-TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re National Steel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Production Credit Association of Minot v. GevingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Galtaco Redlaw Castings Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.