Legal Opinion

Norton v. State Highway Department

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1946No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 43,306PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no canse for action entered in the court of claims. The only meritorious ground urged by plaintiff for reversal is that a certain release of claim, executed by him is void if procured by coercion and duress. The facts are not in dispute.

In 1933 plaintiff was awarded a contract by the State highway department for certain highway construction work in Houghton county. The work was part of a Federal aid project and after the work was commenced the Federal bureau of highways demanded a resurvey of the project and a change of plans. This was done, resulting in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Lafayette Dramatic Productions, Inc. v. FerentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Clement v. Buckley Mercantile Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rees v. SchmitsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  5. City of Saginaw v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Apfelblat v. National Bank Wyandotte-TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re National Steel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  4. Production Credit Association of Minot v. GevingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Galtaco Redlaw Castings Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API