R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a declaratory judgment holding that appellant, hereinafter called Haberman, is not entitled to restitution or refund of the consideration paid by his testatrix to appellee, hereinafter called Equitable, for a certain annuity policy, in excess of the payments already made to testatrix or her estate. The following statement of the facts and issues is adapted from the agreed statement made by the parties in accordance with Rule 76, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
Haberman is a resident of San Antonio, Texas, and Equitable is a New York…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Pioche Mines Consol., Inc. v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Isenberg v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Flinn v. GillenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Gill v. S.H.B. CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Treasure Salvors, Inc. v. The Unidentified Wrecked And Abandoned Sailing VesselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Mike Gustin v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Kuehne & Nagel (AG & Co.) v. Geosource, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Tom H. Riddell, Jr., Cross-Appellees v. The National Democratic Party, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. Chicago Cardboard Co., Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, D/B/A Radiant Color Company, Intervening and Counter-Plaintiffs v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., Robert C. Switzer and Joseph L. Switzer, Counter-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.