Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlos Quintanilla and Leticia Gutierrez
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 20, 1993No. 91-2223, 91-2224PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a scheme to defraud the G. Heileman Brewing Company through the submission of false funding proposals to the company’s corporate sponsorship program. Carlos Quintanilla and Leticia Gutierrez, two participants in the scam, were convicted of conspiring to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), and of transporting stolen property in interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2314. In addition, Gutierrez was convicted of money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A) and (B)(i), conspiracy to defraud the IRS,…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Posada-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. StarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- McM Partners, Incorporated v. Andrews-Bartlett & Associates, Incorporated, Doing Business as Andrews-Bartlett Exposition ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. James P. LedonneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.