Legal Opinion

City Of Mukilteo v. Snohomish County, Respondent's

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 23, 2017No. 74327-9Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON c_ CITY OF MUKILTEO and SAVE OUR No. 74327-9-1 c: COMMUNITIES, DIVISION ONE Appellants, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY and UNPUBLISHED PROPELLER AIRPORTS PAINE FIELD LLC, FILED: January 23. 2017 Respondents. Cox, J. — The City of Mukilteo and Save Our Communities (collectively "Mukilteo") appeal the order granting summary judgment to Propeller Airports Paine Field LLC (Propeller) and Snohomish County.1 We hold that there are no genuine issues of material fact for trial. The County and Propeller are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Metcalf v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API