Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zufelt

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1993No. 91CA1061PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TURSI.

Defendants, Charles and Michael Smith, appeal from a judgment entered upon jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs, Kory Zufelt and his parents and next friends, Ronald and Katherine Zufelt. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

This appeal arises from injuries sustained by plaintiff Kory Zufelt in a hunting accident which occurred on January 16, 1988. The following facts are not in dispute.

Ellis and Maude Smith agreed to watch 8-year-old Kory and 12-year-old Troy Zu-felt for the day at their rural home while the senior Zufelts were at work.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. University of Denver v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. City of Aurora v. LovelessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. County Workers Compensation Pool v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Smith v. State Compensation Insurance FundColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Zufelt Ex Rel. ZufeltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Montoya v. Grease Monkey Holding Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Simon v. CoppolaColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Pierce v. WiglesworthColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Peters v. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API