Pierce v. Wiglesworth
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge METZGER.
In this personal injury, action against defendant, Richard' L. Wiglesworth, plaintiff, Erie J. Pierce, challenges the trial court’s interpretation of the proportionate fault statute, § 13-21-111.5(4), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6A), which provides that, when two or more persons “consciously conspire and deliberately pursue a common plan or design to commit a tortious act,” the tortfeasors shall be held jointly liable for the damages resulting from their actions. The trial court concluded that the defendant could not be held jointly liable under the statute for damages…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cox v. Pearl Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Kussman v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Brochner v. Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Greenemeier Ex Rel. Redington v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Gutierrez v. BusseyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Toothman v. Freeborn & PetersColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- LB Rose Ranch v. Hansen ConstructionColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Smith v. VincentColorado Court of Appeals · 2003