Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zufelt Ex Rel. Zufelt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 12, 1994No. 92SC845PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

In this case we are called upon to decide the appropriate amount of settlement proceeds, if any, that should be offset from a jury award when a plaintiff has both settled with a nonparty and successfully litigated claims for the same injury against nonset-tiling defendants. After a jury verdict for plaintiff, the trial court reduced the jury award by deducting an amount based on the fault attributed to the settling nonparty, which amount was less than the total settlement paid by the nonparty. The court of appeals reversed, holding that because settlement proceeds are payments from a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Ingram v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Krieser Ex Rel. Krieser v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Winkler v. Rocky Mountain Conference of the United Methodist ChurchColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API