Legal Opinion
Simon v. Coppola
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 1994No. 91CA2101PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Judge STERNBERG.
Defendant Eaton Corporation (manufaer turer) appeals a judgment entered on a verdict finding it partially liable for the plaintiffs’ injuries. Plaintiffs, James and Marilyn Simon (homeowners), cross-appeal. Defendant Rob Coppola, d/b/a Designer Spas and Hot Tubs, (Coppola) responds to both the appeal and cross-appeal. We affirm, but remand for allowance of costs.
In late 1987, the homeowners contracted with Tom and Bill Schnell, d/b/a Property Renovation Specialists, for the installation of a deck and a used hot tub. The Schnells in turn contracted with Coppola…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stephen Brent WHEELER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Cherry Creek School District 5 v. Voelker Ex Rel. VoelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Publix Cab Co. v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. Zufelt Ex Rel. ZufeltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Ferrellgas, Inc. v. YeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Evans v. Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Vista Resorts, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Montoya v. Grease Monkey Holding Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.