Legal Opinion

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Storms

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. Docket No. 54, Calendar No. 37,387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Acting under 2 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 9710-9716, defendants organized an unincorporated association and conducted a private banking business. After operating eight or nine years the bank became insolvent. September 27, 1930, plaintiff, on petition of a majority of association’s trustees, was appointed receiver. Some months later, it being made to appear to the court that the bank’s assets were insufficient to meet its -liabilities to the extent of ma-ny thousand dollars, the receiver was directed by the court to file a bill in equity against the members of the association to collect from them ‘…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Anderson v. Stayton State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lackner v. McKechneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
  5. Matter of RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American State Bank v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Squire v. SteckOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Crystal Bay Corp. v. SchmittNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  4. O'Connell v. HolbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Upton v. UptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API