Legal Opinion

Watterson v. Masterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1896No. 2277PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. W. H. Pritchard, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

A portion of the defendants in this action gave notice of appeal, but did not serve it upon all who had appeared in the action. Thereafter the defendants not served with notice themselves gave notice and served it upon all necessary parties. Respondents moved to dismiss both appeals; the first for the reason that the required parties had not been served, and the second because it was taken while the first was pending and undisposed of.

It was clearly the right of the defendants not served with notice of the first appeal to give notice in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. BookWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Smathers v. Bank.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Cowden v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Stone v. Union Stock Yards State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API