Maresca v. Allen

The named defendant has appealed from a judgment of strict foreclosure against him. An examination of the pro se defendant’s arguments on appeal 1 reveals two claims: (1) that the trial court abused its discretion in setting and in refusing to extend the law day, and (2) that the trial court erred in not considering the value of the property which was foreclosed and the prevailing economic conditions. We find no error.

On September 8, 1978, the defendant executed a note and a mortgage deed to secure the note to the plaintiff. After the defendant failed to pay the interest due on January 8,…