Legal Opinion

Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. Kneller

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 16, 1996No. 14071PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

This is an appeal taken by the defendant Edward J. Przybysz from a judgment of strict foreclosure, the granting of a motion for deficiency judgment and the attendant valuation of the subject real property. The defendant alleges that the trial court improperly (1) retracted its order to reset the law day, (2) denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs motion *117for deficiency judgment, and (3) admitted the testimony of the plaintiffs appraiser. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this appeal. On or about December 29, 1989,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Eichman v. J & J Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. First National Bank of Chicago v. LueckenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Bank of Southeastern Connecticut v. Nazarko Realty GroupConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Bishop's Corner Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Service Merchandise Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Bank One National Assoc. v. Megos, No. 123684 (Apr. 16, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API