Legal Opinion
Longlois v. Stratasys, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 24, 2015No. 13-CV-3345 (JNE/SER)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Charles Longlois brings this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., alleging that he worked overtime hours for which his former employer, Defendant Stratasys, Inc., did not properly compensate him. The case is before the Court on the parties’ *1061cross-motions for summary judgment and on Longlois’ motion to exclude the testimony of Stratasys’ two expert witnesses.
For the reasons and in the manner set forth below, both of Longlois’ motions are granted in part and denied in part, while Stratasys’ motion is denied.
B…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Regan v. City of CharlestonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Cleveland v. The BehemothDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Farah v. Alpha & Omega USA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC. v. Tricam Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Payne v. Freeman Transit, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.