Cleveland v. The Behemoth
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROBERT CLEVELAND, Case No.: 19-cv-0672-GPC-BGS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS 12 v. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 13 THE BEHEMOTH, [ECF 37] 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Robert Cleveland has filed a Motion for Evidence Preclusion and 17 Monetary Sanctions for an allegedly untimely production of discovery. (Doc. 37). 18 Defendant The Behemoth has filed an Opposition. (Doc. 40). For the reasons set forth 19 below, the Motion is DENIED. 20 I. Timeliness of Defendant’s Supplemental Production 21 A. Legal Standard 22…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lori David v. Caterpillar, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hyde & Drath v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Securities Groups v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Laro v. New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.