Legal Opinion
Itzkoff v. F & G Realty of New Jersey, Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 30, 1995No. Civ. 93-526 (WGB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge:
Defendant Foremost Cold Storage, Inc. (“Foremost”) has moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Gerald Itzkoff, an individual partnership doing business as Gerald Itzkoff (“Itzkoff’), pursuant to New Jersey’s entire controversy doctrine. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Foremost’s motion and dismiss plaintiffs complaint.
7. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Gerald Itzkoff is an individual conducting business as a fur trader in the fur district of New York, New York. In that capacity,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta Agusta Aerospace Corporation Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, Augusta, S.P.A. Augusta, S.P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Heindel v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Esoldi v. EsoldiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Capital Asset Research Corp. v. Swinton (In Re Swinton)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Nubenco Enterprises, Inc. v. Inversiones Barberena, S.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.