Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta Agusta Aerospace Corporation Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, Augusta, S.P.A. Augusta, S.P.A
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
New Jersey’s entire controversy doctrine is an extremely robust claim preclusion device that requires adversaries to join all possible claims stemming from an event or series of events in one suit. Animated by the laudable goal of easing the burdens of excessive litigation, the doctrine was developed in the domestic context, precluding suits in New Jersey courts based on disputes that were previously the subject of litigation in New Jersey courts. It has attained interjurisdictional proportions, however, and has been used in New Jersey to preclude…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Harold Hoffman v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Filomena Peloro, AKA Filomena Delomo v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Investigation Richard W. Hill R.H. Research, Inc. Filomena PeloroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Maertin v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.