Legal Opinion

Brady v. Lewless

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 21, 1971No. 46180PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The plaintiff filed a tort claim against the defendant, who was 12 years old at the time the alleged injury took place. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment *859which was overruled. An appeal was taken and the case is here for review. Held:

Submitted May 5, 1971 Decided September 21, 1971 Rehearing denied November 16, 1971

Code § 105-1806 provides: "Infancy is no defense to an action for a tort, provided the defendant has arrived at those years of discretion and accountability prescribed by this Code for criminal offenses.” The age of discretion and accountability for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Railroad v. BrinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Riggs v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Faith v. MassengillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Harris v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Shirey v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ashbaugh v. TrotterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Hatch v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. State v. OaksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Scarboro v. LaukCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Jackson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API