Wangen v. Leum
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
It is the contention of the appellant herein that the finding of the judge that Alton Wangen was the agent of his wife for the sale of the farm is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. The respondent urges that this court sustain the judgment on the basis that the finding of agency is not contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.
Although we have carefully examined the evidence tending to support or disprove an agency relationship, we are satisfied that such considerations are not relevant to the disposition of this case. We conclude…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cumps v. KiyoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Rosenthal v. PleckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Eaton Center Co-operative Cheese Co. v. KalkofenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Helander v. WogensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Gotfredson Bros. v. DusingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glinski v. SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State Bank of Drummond v. ChristophersenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Weber v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. Estate of JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Thorp Sales Corp. v. LeaseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.