State Bank of Drummond v. Christophersen

John N. Christophersen has appealed from an order of the county court which modified a foreclosure judgment from which he sought to be relieved in toto pursuant to sec. 806.07, Stats.

The essence of John Christophersen’s claim is that the mortgage the original judgment purported to foreclose was totally void, because his signature appearing on the mortgage and note was forged, that the signature was fraudulently affixed by his then wife, Emily Christopher-sen, and that he was unaware of the existence of the mortgage-foreclosure action until after entry of judgment. Upon these basic facts, he…