Legal Opinion

Weber v. Weber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1993No. 90-2327PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals, 169 Wis. 2d 538, 485 N.W.2d 447 (Ct. App. 1992), affirming a decision of the circuit court, James M. Mason, Judge, which denied the defendants' motion for relief from a Judgment of Foreclosure under sec. 806.07(l)(d), Stats. The defendants, Ruth and Jerold Weber, argued that Ruth's failure to sign the mortgages and notes given by her husband, Jerold, to his parents, plaintiffs Eugene and Ann Weber, rendered the mortgages void under the homestead requirement of the statute of frauds, sec. 706.02(l)(f), Stats. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glinski v. SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Scofield v. HopkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cumps v. KiyoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Conner v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Warsco v. Oshkosh Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Conley Publishing Group Ltd. v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jones v. Estate of JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re FinkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  5. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. StehnoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API