Legal Opinion

State v. Barr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 1983No. C78-04-06270, C81-02-32278, C81-02-31279, C81-03-31384 and C 81-06-32823; CA A24090, A24091, A24092, A24093 and A24094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant seeks reversal of three convictions for theft. In the alternative, he requests modification of the sentences imposed on those convictions, a conviction for failure to appear and a probation violation. He assigns as errors (1) the admission of evidence of a prior burglary conviction and an instruction referring to that conviction, (2) the admission of other “bad acts” evidence and (3) the imposition of five concurrent five-year sentences. We reverse.

At trial, the state introduced evidence that checks had been stolen from three separate businesses in the Portland metropolitan area…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. HockingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Youngblood v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MinchueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. FriedleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API