Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 1990No. 88-10-0260, 88-10-0261, 88-10-0262, 88-10-0263; CA A61539PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was charged with two counts of possession of cocaine and two counts of delivery of cocaine. ORS 475.992. At trial, he admitted the drug sales but contended that the informant purchasers had entrapped him. See ORS 161.275. A jury rejected the entrapment defense and convicted him on all charges. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred when it (1) allowed the prosecutor to ask defendant on cross-examination if his wife had caught him having an affair with a woman named Magness or if he had expressed physical intimacy toward Magness; and (2) allowed a rebuttal witness to impeach…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. PeasleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John N. Sheagren, M.D., P.C. v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. HillierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. John N. Sheagren, M.D., P.C. v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API