Legal Opinion

State v. Friedley

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1992No. 19257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

In a jury trial, Robert Allen Friedley was found guilty in March, 1991, of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance, marijuana. I.C. § 37-2732. The crimes were committed in May, 1980. Over Friedley’s objection, the district court allowed the jury to hear evidence that Friedley had twice failed to appear at prior court proceedings in the case. Friedley contends that the admission of this evidence unfairly prejudiced his trial. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his convictions. We affirm for the following reasons.

Friedley was initially…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. HargravesIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. RobranIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. NastoffIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. GonzalezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. McCabeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API