Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. McLaren v. Fairman

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 2, 1982No. 80 C 6557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Alexander McLaren (“McLaren”), an inmate at Pontiac Correctional Center (“Pontiac”), has brought this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) habeas corpus action against Pontiac Warden James W. Fairman. 1 McLaren claims his Illinois state court conviction and sentencing violated his federal constitutional rights 2 in four respects:(1) McLaren was represented by ineffective trial and appellate counsel, in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel.(2) Because the state failed to prove McLaren guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tyrone Perry v. J.W. Fairman and Tyrone Fahner, Carl D. Adams v. J.W. Fairman and Tyrone FahnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. BosseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  3. United States ex rel. Bacon v. DeRobertisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API