Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. Bosse
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 23, 1982No. 82 C 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Homer Hanrahan (“Hanrahan”) has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which comes before this Court for preliminary consideration under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“Rule 4”). Because the petition concededly contains both unexhausted and exhausted claims, the petition is summarily dismissed.
Hanrahan’s Petition
Hanrahan admits (Pet. ¶ 13) three of his six claimed grounds for relief were not presented on his direct appeal through the state court system, People v. Hanrahan, 64 Ill.App.3d 207, 20 Ill.Dec. 866, 380…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The PEOPLE v. JamesIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. FordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. HanrahanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Robert E. Ware v. John Gagnon, Warden, and Bronson LafolletteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Homer E. Hanrahan v. James H. Thieret, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Homer E. Hanrahan v. James Greer, Warden, Menard Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. ThieretDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988