Legal Opinion
Rourke v. Bevis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 29, 1935No. 22711PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER OTJRIAM.
This appear involves two questions: (1) The right to a change of judge, and (2) the right to a continuance of the cause.
The facts are recited in detail in the journal entry of judgment, from which we find that the case was called on the trial docket of the district court of OMahoma county, Okla., on December 9, 1930, before Judge Lucius Babcock. A verbal motion for a continuance was overruled and an affidavit was then presented, urging the disqualification of Judge Babcock by reason of bias. This was sustained by Judge Babcock, and Judge W. G. Long, an assigned judge, was called…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ex Parte HudsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- McGuire v. BlountSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Myers v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Geren v. StorieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Wilmoth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
- Sabin v. LevorsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949