Boyko v. Federated Metals Corp.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtHartshorne, J.
This appeal hinges upon the important and constantly recurring question as to the binding effect of a compromise settlement between employer and employe stated to be a “complete and final disposition” of the matter and thereafter approved by the bureau and entered as a formal award. The workmen’s compensation bureau has twice ruled such an approved agreement to be a final and complete' bar even to a consideration of subsequently increased or diminished disability under section 21-f of the act (as amended by Pamph. L. 1931, ch. 279, p. 704, ¶ 2; Williams v. Yellow Taxi Cab, 7 N. J. Mis. R.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Feldman v. BraunsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Herbert v. Newark Hardware & Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Thomas v. BleachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Clements v. ArrowsmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- George Palm Construction Co. v. BahrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Lewis v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Barber Asphalt Corporation v. Industrial Comm.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Bucci v. Kirkpatrick Construction Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1933
- Belanowitz v. Travelers InsuranceNew York County Court, Essex County · 1939