Legal Opinion

Boyko v. Federated Metals Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 16, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHartshorne, J.

This appeal hinges upon the important and constantly recurring question as to the binding effect of a compromise settlement between employer and employe stated to be a “complete and final disposition” of the matter and thereafter approved by the bureau and entered as a formal award. The workmen’s compensation bureau has twice ruled such an approved agreement to be a final and complete' bar even to a consideration of subsequently increased or diminished disability under section 21-f of the act (as amended by Pamph. L. 1931, ch. 279, p. 704, ¶ 2; Williams v. Yellow Taxi Cab, 7 N. J. Mis. R.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Feldman v. BraunsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  2. Herbert v. Newark Hardware & Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  3. Thomas v. BleachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Clements v. ArrowsmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  5. George Palm Construction Co. v. BahrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Lewis v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Barber Asphalt Corporation v. Industrial Comm.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bucci v. Kirkpatrick Construction Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1933
  5. Belanowitz v. Travelers InsuranceNew York County Court, Essex County · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API