Legal Opinion

Belanowitz v. Travelers Insurance

New York County Court, Essex County

Decided June 13, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hartshorne, G. P. J.

This workmen’s compensation rule hinges on two questions, first a procedural one, as to the imposition of liability on the insurance carrier after same has already been fixed as to the employer; second, a substantive one, as to whether the functional disability test, applicable in case of accidental injuries, also applies to compensable occupational diseases.

A brief statement of the facts, in chronological order, will be helpful. During 1933 the workman-petitioner was employed by the A. Fishman Hat Company, Inc., as a result of which he was exposed to mercury poisoning, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burbage v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  2. Tucker v. Frank J. Beltramo, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Everhart v. Newark Cleaning & Dyeing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. De Zeng Standard Co. v. PresseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Drake v. C. v. Hill & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API