Feldman v. Braunstein
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari to the Hudson Pleas.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
This is a case under the Workmen’s Compensation act. The petitioner received a very serious injury in-the eye. The judge found that the injury was temporary in character if an operation was performed, but that if an operation was not performed the injury was permanent and ■amounted to ninety per cent, of the loss of an eye. He, there-} fore, as he said, in order to allow the petitioner to undergo1} an operation, determined that the injury was temporary! and that the petitioner was entitled to receive compensation,}' for his injury during such…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Schiller v. B. O.R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Strong v. Sonken-Galamba Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Sykes v. Republic Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Wilson Lumber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Lister v. JB Eurell Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.