Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Braunstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 29, 1915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On certiorari to the Hudson Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

This is a case under the Workmen’s Compensation act. The petitioner received a very serious injury in-the eye. The judge found that the injury was temporary in character if an operation was performed, but that if an operation was not performed the injury was permanent and ■amounted to ninety per cent, of the loss of an eye. He, there-} fore, as he said, in order to allow the petitioner to undergo1} an operation, determined that the injury was temporary! and that the petitioner was entitled to receive compensation,}' for his injury during such…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schiller v. B. O.R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  2. Strong v. Sonken-Galamba Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Sykes v. Republic Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Wilson Lumber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Lister v. JB Eurell Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API