Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Bleach

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This writ brings up for review the action of the Common Pleas Court of Morris county in affirming the bureau which allowed a further award because of increased incapacity in a workman’s compensation case.

James Thomas, (hereinafter called the employe), while in the employ of the prosecutor of this writ, Liondale Bleach, *256Dye and Print Works (hereinafter called the employer), suffered an accident on May 29th, 1925. On September 20th, 1926, a compensation agreement was entered into between such employer and employe, and upon their request, was approved by the workmen’s compensation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herbert v. Newark Hardware & Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyko v. Federated Metals Corp.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1932
  2. Federal Leather Co. v. DerensisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Federated Metals Corp. v. BoykoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Olosh v. General Leather Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  5. P. Bronstein & Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API