Thomas v. Bleach
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiam.
This writ brings up for review the action of the Common Pleas Court of Morris county in affirming the bureau which allowed a further award because of increased incapacity in a workman’s compensation case.
James Thomas, (hereinafter called the employe), while in the employ of the prosecutor of this writ, Liondale Bleach, *256Dye and Print Works (hereinafter called the employer), suffered an accident on May 29th, 1925. On September 20th, 1926, a compensation agreement was entered into between such employer and employe, and upon their request, was approved by the workmen’s compensation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Herbert v. Newark Hardware & Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boyko v. Federated Metals Corp.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1932
- Federal Leather Co. v. DerensisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Federated Metals Corp. v. BoykoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Olosh v. General Leather Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- P. Bronstein & Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935