Legal Opinion

Friel v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1959No. Civ. 23766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment wherein the court declared that certain provisions of the zoning ordinances of the county of Los Angeles, with reference to the drilling of oil wells were constitutional, reasonable, non-discriminating and not arbitrary, and that plaintiffs were not entitled to an injunction or any relief.

The appellants are the owners of, or claim the exclusive right to drill for oil in three noncontiguous parcels of land consisting of about one acre each, situated in a residential, unincorporated area of the county of Los Angeles, and which said area is zoned for residential…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API