Legal Opinion

Guy v. Liberenz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1902No. 19,972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From DeKalb Circuit Court; E. A. Bratton, Special Judge. Suit by William J. Guy and wife against William Liberenz and wife to foreclose a mortgage. . From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court, under clause 2, §1387j Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellants brought this action against appellees on a promissory note secured by a mortgage executed by appellees. A special finding of facts was made by the court, and conclusions of law stated thereon. Over a motion for a new trial by appellants, a judgment in accordance with the conclusions of law was rendered. That the court erred in each of the conclusions of law is the only error assigned and not waived.

It appears from the special finding that appellee William Liberenz, on November 24, 1896, contracted, on his individual account, with Yount & Yount, to erect a livery bam for them on a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vogel v. LeichnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Simpson v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Ward v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott v. CollierIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Russell v. Trustees of Purdue UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Harbaugh v. TannerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wetmore & Morse Granite Co. v. RyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. ZollmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API