Legal Opinion

Crisp v. SOUTHCO. INC.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 29, 2010No. 4746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, SouthCo. Inc. (South-Co.) argues the circuit court erred in its capacity as an appellate court by reversing the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (Commission) finding that Michael Crisp (Crisp) did not sustain a physical brain injury. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

Crisp was an employee of SouthCo., a grassing and seeding company. On March 10, 2004, Crisp was assisting his coworkers in installing an erosion control fence. The installation of the fence required a Bobcat earthmover bucket to press poles into the ground. While Crisp was erecting a pole, the Bobcat…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Rogers v. Kunja Knitting Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Pack v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crisp v. Southco., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Baker v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API