Legal Opinion

Denning v. Quist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1933No. 24048. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant commenced this action in the lower court to recover damages on account of the alleged negligence of respondents, the husbands, who henceforth will be mentioned as if the only respondents. Appellant alleged in his complaint, in so far as is here material:

“That at all times hereinafter mentioned, and particularly on or about the 9th day of May, 1929, the said defendants A. W. Quist and A. S. Downey were the general contractors doing business under the said firm name of A. W. Quist Company in the construction and building of an addition to the St. Johns Hospital at Port Townsend,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. McHughWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Denning v. QuistWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. DeGrief v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Purdy & Whitfield v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Riley v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API