Legal Opinion
United States of America, and Quinalt Indian Tribe, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. State of Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1985No. 84-3571PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
We must again resolve a dispute arising from the district court’s continuing jurisdiction in the Northwest Indian Fisheries litigation. The district court’s initial decision apportioning the opportunity to catch fish 50-50 between the Indian tribes and non-Indians is reported in United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974) (Boldt I), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086, 96 S.Ct. 877, 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
FACTS
The issues presented on this appeal are tied to the question of salmon escapement on the Queets, Hoh, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. San Diego Baykeeper, Inc. Kenneth J. Moser v. Southwest Marine IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. SciarraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Fish & Game Commission, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- King v. Ionization International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.