Legal Opinion
Liverpool v. Baltimore Diamond Exchange Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 11, 2002No. 89, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
This case was initiated by Noel S. Liverpool, Petitioner, against Baltimore Diamond Exchange, Inc., d/b/a Radcliffe Jewelers, Respondent, as a civil action in the District Court of Maryland, sitting in Baltimore County. Petitioner’s complaint for money damages was based on Respondent’s alleged violations of the Maryland Layaway Sales Act (“the Act”), codified in Maryland Code (1978, 1990 RepLVol.), Commercial Law Article, §§ 14-1101-14-1110. 1 The instant case requires that we address the construction and interpretation of the Act for the first time since its enactment in 1978.
T…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Witte v. AzarianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Drew v. First Guaranty Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Arizona State Board for Charter Schools v. U.S. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.