Legal Opinion

United States v. Jacquinto

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1979No. Crim. 78-322-1, 78-322-2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORRECTION OF DEFECTIVE RULE 11 HEARING

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

On January 2, 1979, Dominic Jacquinto pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of violating 21 U.S.C. § 846, which prohibits, inter alia, conspiring to distribute controlled substances. On that same date, Raymond Trainor pleaded guilty to a charge of violating the same conspiracy statute, as well as to charges of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841, which prohibits the substantive offense of distribution. At the plea hearing, in informing the defendants of the maximum penalty to which they would be subject under § 846, I relied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Scott JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Charles Burman, United States of America v. Joseph Lewis Walker, United States of America v. Julia WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. DankertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Fassette v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
  5. United States v. MearnsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Andrew Kirkpatrick Mearns, Iii, Peter John Thomas, John William HedleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. WellsDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1979
  5. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API