United States v. Jacquinto
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORRECTION OF DEFECTIVE RULE 11 HEARING
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
On January 2, 1979, Dominic Jacquinto pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of violating 21 U.S.C. § 846, which prohibits, inter alia, conspiring to distribute controlled substances. On that same date, Raymond Trainor pleaded guilty to a charge of violating the same conspiracy statute, as well as to charges of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841, which prohibits the substantive offense of distribution. At the plea hearing, in informing the defendants of the maximum penalty to which they would be subject under § 846, I relied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Robert Scott JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Charles Burman, United States of America v. Joseph Lewis Walker, United States of America v. Julia WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. DankertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Fassette v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
- United States v. MearnsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Andrew Kirkpatrick Mearns, Iii, Peter John Thomas, John William HedleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. WellsDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1979
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.