Legal Opinion

United States v. Wells

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided May 8, 1979No. Crim. 78-161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HANSON, Senior District Judge.

Thirty-two defendants were implicated in two separate conspiracies to distribute heroin, a Schedule I controlled substance under 21 U.S.C. § 812. As a result of plea bargaining agreements entered into with the Government, twelve defendants pled guilty to a United States Attorney’s Information charging each with being an accessory after the fact in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3 to the substantive offense of conspiracy to distribute heroin. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. Thereafter, this Court sentenced each of the twelve defendants to a special parole term in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Timmreck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Robert Scott JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Charles Burman, United States of America v. Joseph Lewis Walker, United States of America v. Julia WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  4. Fassette v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
  5. United States v. MearnsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. LathernDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  4. United States v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API