Legal Opinion
Fassette v. United States
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 7, 1978No. CV 77-4481-IHPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255
IRVING HILL, District Judge.
The instant proceeding was begun by a letter dated November 17, 1977, to the Court from the Petitioner acting in pro. per. The Court treated said letter as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion grows out of a conviction of the Petitioner in the Court of the undersigned in the case of United States v. Fassette and others, No. CR 74-756-IH.
The Court on November 30,1977, ordered a response to the motion from the Government, which response was filed January 17, 1978. Petitioner’s reply to the Government’s Response was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Brian Dennis BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gary Lee MackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. DankertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Gary Lee MackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Donald BienvenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Robert Scott JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Charles Burman, United States of America v. Joseph Lewis Walker, United States of America v. Julia WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.