Legal Opinion

United States v. Dankert

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1975No. 74-3282PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a part of the sentence imposed as a result of a plea of guilty to a charge of conspiring, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 963, to import cocaine, a Schedule II narcotic controlled substance, into the United States, a vio*191lation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 952(a). The complaint is to that part of the sentence imposing a special parole term of three years following release from incarceration.

It is conceded that a special parole term following incarceration is mandatory under 21 U.S.C.A. § 960(b)(1), upon conviction of a substantive violation of § 952(a)(1). The argument is that the…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Donald BienvenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Robert Scott JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Charles Burman, United States of America v. Joseph Lewis Walker, United States of America v. Julia WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API