Legal Opinion
Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 17, 1997No. 1:96CV1217PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIS, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This patent infringement suit involves four patents, three of which the plaintiff asserts against the defendant and the fourth which the counterclaiming defendant asserts against the plaintiff. The motion at bar concerns the patent asserted in the counterclaim, namely U.S. Patent No. 4,931,042 (the “042 patent”). Specifically, the matter before the Court is defendant’s motion, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256, to correct the inventorship of the 042 patent by adding the name of a previously omitted third inventor. For the reasons that follow, the motion must…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Dr. David D. Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., and Jerome Goldstein, Ernest v. Groman and Lee JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Informatics Applications Group, Inc. v. ShkolnikovDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Rhone-Poulenc Agro, S.A. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018