Legal Opinion

Hennessy v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1941No. S. F. No. 16593PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In October, 1940, the petitioner, an attorney at law admitted to practice in this state, was charged with misconduct involving moral turpitude and dishonesty (sec. 6106, art. 6, State Bar Act), in that he retained and converted to his own use moneys of his client deposited with him for disbursement.

The petitioner was born in San Francisco in April, 1894. He became an electrician by trade and was a chief electrician in the navy in the first world war. While still following that trade he studied law and was admitted to practice in January, 1926. Prior to 1940 he was practicing law in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Petersen v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Resner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Narlian v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cheleden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Egan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API