Rochkind v. Stevenson
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtDeborah S. Eyler, J.
In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Starlena Stevenson sued S&S Partnership (“S&S”), Stanley Rochkind, and Dear Management & Construction Company (“Dear”) for negligence and violations of the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), Md. Code (1975, 2013 Repl. Vol.), section 13-301 et seq. of the Commercial Law Article (“CL”). 1 As relevant here, she alleged that she suffered injuries as a result of ingesting lead-based paint inside 3823 Fairview Avenue (“the Fairview Property”), which was owned by Mr. Rochkind and S&S and was managed by Dear.
In March of 2014, the case was tried to a jury with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Friolo v. FrankelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Golt v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Sugarman v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Oglesby v. Baltimore School AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Sugarman v. LilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.