Legal Opinion

Rochkind v. Stevenson

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 2016No. 0418/15PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeborah S. Eyler, J.

In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Starlena Stevenson sued S&S Partnership (“S&S”), Stanley Rochkind, and Dear Management & Construction Company (“Dear”) for negligence and violations of the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), Md. Code (1975, 2013 Repl. Vol.), section 13-301 et seq. of the Commercial Law Article (“CL”). 1 As relevant here, she alleged that she suffered injuries as a result of ingesting lead-based paint inside 3823 Fairview Avenue (“the Fairview Property”), which was owned by Mr. Rochkind and S&S and was managed by Dear.

In March of 2014, the case was tried to a jury with…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Friolo v. FrankelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Golt v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Sugarman v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Oglesby v. Baltimore School AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Sugarman v. LilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API