Legal Opinion
BROADHACKER v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 2007No. 49A02-0511-CV-1084PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Frank and Ann Broadhacker and Reel One, Inc. appeal a summary judgment for the City of Indianapolis. We reverse, as there is a genuine issue of material fact whether Reel One is a private club and therefore not subject to the nuisance ordinance on which the City relied to enjoin the operation of Reel One and fine the Broadhackers.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts most favorable to Reel One as the non-moving party are that the Broad-hackers started Reel One as a private club in 1992. When they inquired with the City, they were told by a City representative the property…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Daniel v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States Power Squadrons v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lynn v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- United States Power Squadrons v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BROADHACKER v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007