Legal Opinion

Lynn v. Allen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1896No. 17,988PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— This was an action in attachment, *585brought against the appellant by the appellee, Arthur W. Allen. The appellant, who is a non-resident, entered his special appearance in the cause, and filed a plea in abatement, averring that there had been no service of process upon him, “other than the pretended service of publication in a daily paper called ‘The Daily Reporter/ printed and published in the city of Indianapolis, said county,” and “that said pretended service by publication is invalid and of no effect for the reason the said ‘The Daily Reporter’ is not a newspaper of general circulation in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kerr v. HittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Kellogg v. CarricoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Benkendorf v. VincenzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Briggs v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Railton v. LauderIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. City of Corpus Christi v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Sims v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Puget Sound Publishing Co. v. Times Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Burak v. DitsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Great Southern Media, Inc. v. McDowell CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API