Legal Opinion

BROADHACKER v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 2007No. 49A02-0511-CV-1084Published

1Opinion of the Court

864 N.E.2d 372 (2007)

Frank BROADHACKER, Ann Broadhacker and Reel One, an Indiana Corporation, Appellants-Defendants,

v.

CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and the Metropolitan Development Commission of Marion County, Indiana, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

No. 49A02-0511-CV-1084.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

April 17, 2007.

Stuart T. Bench, Bench Law Office, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellants.

Andrew J. Mallon, City of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellees.

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Frank and Ann Broadhacker and Reel One, Inc. appeal a summary judgment for the City of Indianapolis. We reverse, as there is a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Baker; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Sullivan.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tillman v. Wheaton-Haven Recreation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Daniel v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States Power Squadrons v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Lynn v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API